Im Ben Webb, Project Manager, I’ve spent my career analysing why complex projects fail under scrutiny — and why a small number succeed despite operating in unforgiving, high-visibility environments. The Super Bowl now sits firmly in that category. What unfolds on the field is only part of the story. Increasingly, the real project challenge lies in managing systems of influence, attention, and narrative that move faster than any traditional delivery framework was ever designed to handle.
When the Super Bowl became the world’s most-watched annual media event, its risks were defined by power grids, broadcast feeds and crowd flows. Today, those risks — and opportunities — are no longer contained in physical systems alone. They now spill into networked digital infrastructures, algorithmic attention loops, and real-time content streams.
The proliferation of content creators — be they TikTok personalities, lifestyle influencers, or niche community stars — at the Super Bowl isn’t a frivolous side effect of modern culture. It’s one of the most significant scope expansions in the history of the event, rewriting how impact is measured, how engagement is generated, and how organisational governance must adapt.
From a project delivery perspective, the influencer ecosystem at the Super Bowl is not a marketing tactic. It is a parallel delivery stream — one that creates value, introduces risk, and must be managed with as much intentionality as transportation, broadcast, or security.
The Evolution of Influence at the Big Game
For decades, the NFL’s Super Bowl broadcast was controlled, closed, and predictable. Official media feeds, scheduled ad slots and scripted narratives dominated the environment. That model collapsed as soon as influencers entered the equation.
In recent years, the league has invited hundreds of content creators to attend and cover the event — a deliberate strategy to expand audience reach beyond traditional broadcast channels. Platforms like YouTube and Snapchat are partnering directly with the NFL to bring creators into the fold, hosting events, behind-the-scenes access and original content creation designed to spread virally among younger and more diverse audiences.
By integrating content creators into official Super Bowl programming — from multimedia activations to on-site collaborations — the NFL has turned what once felt like an external commentary layer into an embedded extension of the event itself.
This reflects a larger shift in how influence operates in contemporary media: massive audiences are no longer exclusively reached through television broadcast, but through fragmentation, platform dynamics, and creator-driven communities. Influencers are not just covering the event — they are producing parts of its lived experience for millions of viewers.
Why the NFL Couldn’t Ignore Influencers
The decision to formally embrace influencers was as much strategic as it was economic.
First, audiences have fractured. Younger demographics spend less time with traditional broadcast and more time with curated content on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and Snapchat. By making creators part of the Super Bowl ecosystem, the NFL ensures that the game reaches those attention pools natively, not through forced broadcast extensions.
Second, influencer engagement isn’t just reach — it’s trust. Many creators cultivate intensely loyal audiences precisely because they feel more authentic than traditional advertising. Marketers know this, and brands are increasingly using creators not just for visibility, but for engagement quality.
Third, the influencer ecosystem has become a competitor to traditional commercial spaces. A $7–$8 million Super Bowl commercial remains a cornerstone of big-game marketing, but creator-led campaigns — which can be deployed across multiple platforms, formats and contexts — offer a flexibility and authenticity that broadcast spots alone cannot match.
Put simply, the NFL didn’t embrace creators because it wanted to. It did so because audience behaviour forced it to. Ignoring influencers would have meant surrendering relevance to platforms and populations the league cannot afford to lose.
Influencers as Unmanaged Project Interfaces
From the perspective of a project manager, the influencer environment represents a classic governance challenge: how to incorporate a powerful stakeholder group that cannot be controlled through standard contractual means.
Influencers are not:
- contractors
- employees
- vendor partners
- regulated media
Yet they have:
- enormous reach
- real-time narrative power
- impact on brand perception
- influence over ticket sales, merchandise, and cultural conversation
This makes them a high-impact, low-control stakeholder group — one that traditional project risk frameworks struggle to handle.
In most delivery domains, unmanaged interfaces like this would be treated as a red flag. Yet the Super Bowl has not just tolerated them — it has designed systems to work with them.
This is a fundamental shift in delivery logic.
Systems Design: Control Through Environment, Not Contract
The Super Bowl’s response to this challenge is not about restricting influencer behaviour — that would be futile — but about designing conditions that shape behaviour.
Rather than try to command what influencers post or how they post it, the NFL and its partners focus on:
- controlled access structures that offer valuable content opportunities
- embedded content zones where creator activity is anticipated and integrated
- pre-approved activation moments that align creator content with sponsor narratives
- platform partnerships that extend reach without weakening brand control
This is design thinking applied to stakeholder management:
when you can’t control a participant directly, you control the environment they operate in.
That’s a mark of delivery maturity — far beyond what most organisations achieve in practice.
The Risk of Scope Creep — and How the Super Bowl Manages It
Every unmanaged stakeholder introduces scope creep — unintended consequences, emergent behaviours, and unpredictability.
In other projects, that often leads to:
- timeline delays
- budget overruns
- reputational blowback
- governance failure
At the Super Bowl, similar risks exist:
- influencers can surface sensitive backstage operations
- they can contradict official messaging
- they can generate conflicting sponsor narratives
- they can shift focus away from core event goals
Yet, rather than treating this as a problem to be “solved after the fact,” the league has integrated it into its delivery model. Influencers are invited, credentialed, and given frameworks for collaboration — a recognition that unmanaged influence in the digital age is not an externality, it is a core part of the project environment.
This is a profound insight. It reframes influencer activity not as a chaotic force to be suppressed, but as a variable to be anticipated and governed.
The Business Case: Amplification Meets Engagement
From a commercial standpoint, influencer involvement delivers measurable utility.
Influencer partnerships around the Super Bowl act as a multi-layered amplification engine that extends the value of official marketing beyond the hour-long game broadcast. They do this by:
- producing organic content that fills gaps between official activations
- generating community engagement before, during, and after the event
- driving traffic to brand activations, digital activations, and sponsor activations
- providing deep audience insights and real-time feedback loops
In some cases, creators have even starred in paid Super Bowl campaigns themselves, appearing in ads and surge content that blends traditional broadcast messaging with social authenticity.
This dual approach — premium broadcast + creator ecosystem — is one of the reasons the Super Bowl has remained culturally central while other events struggle to stay relevant in fragmented media landscapes.
The Backlash Problem
But this isn’t risk-free.
Recent controversies around influencer campaigns involving extravagance or lack of inclusivity show how quickly this landscape can become politically or socially volatile. A Super Bowl influencer initiative faced backlash for perceived excess and lack of diversity, underscoring how easy it is for well-intended activations to misfire in the current cultural climate.
This illustrates another reality of modern project delivery: when the audience isn’t homogeneous, stakeholder risk increases. The Super Bowl must account not just for operational risk, but for cultural and reputational risk that evolves at the speed of viral dialogue.
What This Means for Project Leaders Everywhere
The Super Bowl’s handling of the influencer ecosystem isn’t just about sport or social media. It is a case study in how contingent narrative systems become part of the project scope.
For project leaders, this suggests several lessons:
- Unmanaged stakeholders eventually become managed scope. Ignoring powerful forces doesn’t reduce their impact — it increases it.
- Control emerges through conditions, not commands. You rarely control behaviour directly — you design the environment in which behaviour occurs.
- Engagement systems create as much risk as operational systems. Narrative volatility can affect outcomes as tangibly as logistics failure.
- Risk frameworks must include perception, not just operation. In a networked world, reputation collapses can cascade faster than physical disruptions.
This is where the Super Bowl’s influencer project becomes more than interesting anecdote — it becomes a model for modern delivery in a hyperconnected age.
A Project Delivery Conclusion
Inviting influencers to the Super Bowl did not transform the event into chaos. It required the event to evolve its delivery model.
The league didn’t manage every influencer. It managed the conditions under which influence happens — and that distinction is the secret sauce.
In this era, project success is not about controlling every voice. It’s about designing systems resilient enough that uncontrolled voices can’t break them.
And that’s perhaps the most valuable lesson the Super Bowl has to offer.
From a project management perspective, the Super Bowl’s embrace of influencers is not a cultural indulgence — it is a structural response to how modern systems behave under pressure. The league does not attempt to control every voice; it builds delivery models resilient enough to withstand volatility without losing coherence. That distinction matters well beyond sport.
As Ben Webb, Project Manager, this is the lesson I see repeated across industries: projects don’t fail because influence exists, they fail because delivery is too fragile to absorb it. The Super Bowl endures because it designs for exposure, not despite it.
Leave a Reply